The Influence of Teacher Interaction Patterns in Learning on Student Learning Motivation in the Office Management and Business Services Department of YAPMI Makassar Vocational School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70188/ebphdq11Keywords:
Teacher Interaction Patterns, Learning Motivation, StudentsAbstract
This study aims to identify the interaction patterns of teachers in the Office Management and Business Services department at SMK YAPMI Makassar and their influence on student learning motivation. This study is quantitative with a focus on two main variables, namely teacher interaction patterns and student learning motivation. A questionnaire consisting of two main parts, namely teacher interaction patterns in education and student learning motivation, was used to collect data. The results of the study indicate that there is a positive relationship between teacher interaction patterns and student learning motivation at SMK YAPMI Makassar. However, this relationship is relatively weak with a correlation coefficient value close to zero, namely r squared of 0.088. This means that only 8.8% of the variation in the dependent variable (student learning motivation) can be explained by teacher interaction patterns, while 91.2% of the dependence is influenced by other factors not included in this study. The level of student learning motivation at SMK YAPMI Makassar is classified as excellent, with a percentage reaching 82.93%. Student learning motivation is measured through three main indicators: (1) persistence in completing tasks, (2) persistence in facing challenges during the learning process, and (3) the ability to express and defend opinions actively during the learning process. These findings indicate that teacher interaction is not the only determining factor, but it still plays an important role in shaping student learning motivation. Therefore, improving the quality of interaction between teachers and students needs to receive more attention in an effort to improve learning outcomes and active student participation in class. This study also opens up opportunities for further research that can explore other factors that influence student learning motivation more comprehensively, such as classroom environment, teaching methods, and peer interactions.
Downloads
References
Alayont, F. (2014). Using Problem-Based Pre-Class Activities to Prepare Students for In-Class Learning. 24(2), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2013.844510
Aldalur, I., & Perez, A. (2023). Gamification and discovery learning: Motivating and involving students in the learning process. Heliyon, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13135
Alsadoon, E. (2022). Effects of a gamified learning environment on students’ achievement, motivations, and satisfaction. Heliyon, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10249
Annisa, A., Nasrullah, Muh., & Arhas, S. H. (2025). The Influence of Learning Discipline on the Learning Achievement of Class X Students of Office Management and Business Services. International Journal of Administration and Education (IJAE), 2(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.70188/a4wbgy33
Aziz, R., Susilowati, M., Masturin, M., & Prasojo, Z. H. (2023). Teacher-parent collaboration for developing student character in online learning. 12(3), 1477–1485. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24456
Barron, P., & Whitford, M. (2004). An evaluation of event management education: Student reflections on flexible learning processes and procedures. 4(2), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J172v04n02_02
Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, Vol. 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819
Hariri, H., Karwan, D. H., Haenilah, E. Y., Rini, R., & Suparman, U. (2020). Motivation and learning strategies: Student motivation affects student learning strategies. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.39
Hasyim, N., Arfiani, A., & Saleh, S. (2024). The Influence of Teachers’ Pedagogic Competence on Student Learning Activity. International Journal of Administration and Education (IJAE), 1(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.70188/1qc89z25
Hidayah, R., Mu’awanah, E., Zamhari, A., Munardji, & Naqiyah. (2021). Learning worship as a way to improve students’ discipline, motivation, and achievement at school. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(3), 292–310.
Ismail, M. N., Kallow, S. M., Gati, K. H., Al-Bayati, H. N. A., & Butsenko, Y. (2024). Quantitative Approaches in Decision Theory for Enhancing Risk Assessment Strategies. 3(5), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i5.3908
Liu, X., Wang, X., Xu, K., & Hu, X. (2023). Effect of Reverse Engineering Pedagogy on Primary School Students’ Computational Thinking Skills in STEM Learning Activities. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020036
Mathur, G., Nathani, N., Chauhan, A. S., Kushwah, S. V., & Quttainah, M. A. (2024). Students’ Satisfaction and Learning: Assessment of Teaching-Learning Process in Knowledge Organization. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.1.3798
Mcleod, S. (2023). Qualitative Vs Quantitative Research Methods & Data Analysis. Psychology » Research Methodology.
Munoz, L., Miller, R., & Poole, S. M. (2016). Professional student organizations and experiential learning activities: What drives student intentions to participate? Journal of Education for Business, 91(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1110553
Nasrullah, M., & Arhas, S. H. (2025). SPIRIT Model: Conceptual Development of 21st Century Teacher Competencies Based on Systematic Literature Review. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 17(2), 979–994.
Obispo, R. T., Magulod, G. C., & Tindowen, D. J. C. (2021). Teachers’ classroom management styles and student-teacher connectedness and anxiety. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.5.7
Rini, E. F. S., Aldila, F. T., & Wirayuda, R. P. (2023). A STUDY OF STUDENT LEARNING DISCIPLINE IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL. 7(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v7i1.26698
Sardana, N., Shekoohi, S., Cornett, E. M., & Kaye, A. D. (2023). Qualitative and quantitative research methods. In Substance Use and Addiction Research: Methodology, Mechanisms, and Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-98814-8.00008-1
Sari, A. N. I., Nasrullah, Muh., & Nasir, N. (2024). The Influence of Service Quality and Teacher Performance on Student Satisfaction with Administrative Services. Journal of Educational Development and Learning (JEDAL), 1(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.70188/ptqf6v51
Sosiady, M., & Ermansyah. (2023). The Influence of Entrepreneurial Motivation, Entrepreneurial Learning, and the Use of Social Media on Student Entrepreneurship Interest. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 4(2).
Stunell, K. (2021). Supporting student-teachers in the multicultural classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1758660
Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 331–349.
Vo, T. T. D., Tuliao, K. V., & Chen, C. W. (2022). Work Motivation: The Roles of Individual Needs and Social Conditions. Behavioral Sciences, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020049
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Administration and Education (IJAE)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
![](<img src="https://www.clipartmax.com/png/middle/38-383641_open-access-logo-plos-transparent-open-access-logo.png" alt="Open Access Logo Plos Transparent - Open Access Logo@clipartmax.com">){kind=spacer}
