Final Semester Students' Reading Interests: Descriptive Studies as a Basis for Thesis Preparation Readiness

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70188/dwx2pa33

Keywords:

reading interest, undergraduate students, reading habits, reading comprehension, academic motivation, thesis writing, higher education

Abstract

This study aims to describe the reading interest of final-year undergraduate students in preparation for thesis writing. The research employed a quantitative descriptive design involving 37 final-year students selected through total sampling. Data were collected using a structured Likert-scale questionnaire measuring four key indicators: reading preferences and attitudes, reading habits and intensity, reading comprehension ability, and motivation and external support for reading.The findings reveal that students generally exhibit positive reading preferences and attitudes, indicating an awareness of the importance of reading in academic contexts. However, this positive disposition has not yet been fully translated into consistent reading practices. Reading habits and intensity are predominantly categorized as moderate, suggesting that reading activities are still situational and largely driven by immediate academic demands rather than sustained habits. In contrast, students demonstrate relatively strong reading comprehension abilities, indicating adequate cognitive capacity to understand academic texts and engage in research-related activities. Despite this, motivation and external support for reading are found to be relatively low, reflecting limited intrinsic motivation and insufficient environmental encouragement to support continuous reading engagement. Overall, the results highlight a discrepancy between students’ reading competence and their actual reading behavior. While students possess the ability to comprehend academic materials, their engagement in reading remains inconsistent and insufficiently supported by motivational factors. These findings underscore the importance of developing comprehensive academic strategies to enhance students’ reading interest, including the integration of literacy-based curricula, the provision of supportive learning environments, and the strengthening of instructional guidance. Such efforts are essential to foster sustainable reading practices and to improve the quality of undergraduate thesis writing and overall academic achievement.

References

Baba, J., & Affendi, F. R. (2020). Reading habit and students’ attitudes towards reading: A study of students in the faculty of education UiTM puncak alam. 16(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i1.8988

Bopegedera, A. M. R. P. (2021). Student-Driven, Curriculum-Embedded Undergraduate Research Experiences (SD-CUREs) in the Senior Chemistry Curriculum and its Impact on Students. 98(8), 2549–2558. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01140

Caldoza, M. C. S., Julhamid, N. U., & Asiri, M. S. (2024). Critical Thinking Skills and Reading Proficiency among the English Language Students of Public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Sulu. 6(3), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6624

Cekiso, M. P. (2025). Examining how undergraduate students view reading and its significance. 16(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v16i1.593

Chithiraikannu, R., & Dhivya, N. (2021). Impact of mandating the research article based evaluation as an assessment for the pre-final year students for effective execution of final year project. 34(Special Issue), 531–534. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157208

Dammert, M., Matos, L., Gargurevich, R., Vansteenkiste, M., & Haerens, L. (2025). Teachers’ motivating style, students’ basic psychological needs, academic reading motivation, and engagement. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2575473

Darwis, M., Musmin, M., Jamaluddin, J., & Arhas, S. H. (2024). The Implementation of Library Delivery Program in Untia Fisherman’s Village. Khizanah Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 12(2), 280–289.

Emelyanova, Y. B. (2020). Overcoming difficulties in reading academic articles in a foreign language: Designing and running a training workshop. 15(2), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd15.2.07

Eyitayo, O. T. (2011). Do students have the relevant ICT skills they need to do their research projects? 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1145/2047594.2047668

Gorzycki, M., Desa, G., Howard, P. J., & Allen, D. D. (2020). “Reading Is Important,” but “I Don’t Read”: Undergraduates’ Experiences With Academic Reading. 63(5), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1020

Grossman, E. S., & Naidoo, S. (2009). Final-year South African dental student attitudes toward a research component in the curriculum. 73(11), 1306–1312.

Gunobgunob-Mirasol, R. (2019). Vocabulary size, reading motivation, reading attitudes and reading comprehension performance among Filipino college learners of English. 8(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i1.15335

Hou, Y., Verkade, H., & van Driel, J. (2023). How Do Students Interact With the Primary Scientific Literature in an Undergraduate Science Program? 52(3), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2023.12290701

Jafarian, N. R., & Kramer, A.-W. (2025). AI-assisted audio-learning improves academic achievement through motivation and reading engagement. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100357

Knight, R.-A., & Botting, N. (2016). Organising undergraduate research projects: student-led and academic-led models. 8(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2015-0054

Kozeracki, C. A., Carey, M. F., Colicelli, J., & Levis-Fitzgerald, M. (2006). An intensive primary-literature-based teaching program directly benefits undergraduate science majors and facilitates their transition to doctoral programs. 5(4), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-02-0144

Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059

MacMillan, M., & MacKenzie, A. (2012). Strategies for integrating information literacy and academic literacy: Helping undergraduate students make the most of scholarly articles. 33(8), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279885

Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates’ Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors. 41(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.009

Nasaruddin, H., Hatimah, K., Niswaty, R., Herman, H., & Arhas, S. H. (2024). Analysis of Elfan Bookless Library System Innovation at the Barru Regency Library and Archives Office. Khizanah Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 12(1), 89–99.

Netra, I. M., Pramartha, C. R. A., & Eddy, I. W. T. (2023). Digitizing Cultural Practices: Efforts to Increase Students’ Cultural Knowledge and Reading Interest in Bali. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1401.15

Nicolosi, G., & Reiter, L. (2024). The leisure reading habits of undergraduate business students. 31(3–4), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2024.2391736

Othman, Y. (2010). Application of metacognition strategies and awareness when reading texts. 17(3), 457–472.

Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., Irvine, A., Malmström, H., & Mežek, Š. (2012). Reading in tertiary education: Undergraduate student practices and attitudes. 18(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.706464

Urrutia, M., Mariángel, S., Pino, E. J., Guevara, P., Torres-Ocampo, K., Troncoso-Seguel, M., Bustos, C., & Marrero, H. (2024). Impact of Affective and Cognitive Variables on University Student Reading Comprehension. 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060554

Vo, H., & Ho, H. (2024). Online learning environment and student engagement: the mediating role of expectancy and task value beliefs. 51(5), 2183–2207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00689-1

Wang, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2022). Incidental Vocabulary Learning From Bilingual Subtitled Viewing: An Eye-Tracking Study. Language Learning, 72(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12495

Widiana, I. W., Triyono, S., Sudirtha, I. G., Adijaya, M. A., & Wulandari, I. G. A. A. M. (2023). Bloom’s revised taxonomy-oriented learning activity to improve reading interest and creative thinking skills. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2221482

Downloads

Published

2026-03-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Final Semester Students’ Reading Interests: Descriptive Studies as a Basis for Thesis Preparation Readiness. (2026). Journal of Education Policy Praxis, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.70188/dwx2pa33